Пересланное сообщение

От: "Stefan Boersen"

Кому:

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.,

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Отправленные: Понедельник, 7 Июль 2014 г 3:20:26

Тема: The third-order space-by-time relation

Dear Scientist,

In the picture in the right top corner is a mass m at radius r from

the sun. It is moving with a velocity r da/dt in the angular

direction. The mass m experiences a gravity force toward the sun and

in reaction to that it creates a reaction force out of its movement.

The magnitude of the forces is given by equation2.

If one now introduces a velocity dr/dt towards the sun then the mass m

will experience the Coriolis force or Coriolis acceleration. The

Coriolis force or Coriolis acceleration has been unknown until science

differentiated space-by-time twice and discovered equation2. Equation

2 is the magnitude squared of the Newtonian interaction in polar

coordinates and or in Cartesian coordinates. If one differentiates

space-by-time for the third time one is confronted with equations3.

Suppose we have a system that is described with differentiated forces.

If a system, which apparently has changing accelerations in two

dimensions, then what is going to happen? Science thinks in forces,

so science will simply differentiate the forces and then it is assumed

to work all well.

But there is a mistake. If the system is having changing accelerations

in two dimensions it should be described by equations3. This means

that if particle is moving at a radius r with a velocity r da/dt then

it will experience the new third-order Coriolis interactions. These

interactions are unexpected and unseen until one has done the third

time differentiation of space-by-time. The new third-order Coriolis

interactions are derived from a mathematical exercise. They are

discovered the same way as the second order Coriolis interaction has

been discovered. They cannot be stated invalid.

It is now clear that we cannot think in differentiated forces. The

differentiation of space by time for the third time introduces new

third-order Coriolis interactions. Electromagnetic radiation is known

to be described by differentiated forces. The description of

electromagnetic radiation will only work if the described situation is

one-dimensional. The description of electromagnetic radiation cannot

be done with differentiated forces when the forces are

two-dimensional.

If one draws a picture of a two-dimensional force differentiated by

time then one should draw three arrows for the third-order Coriolis

angular interaction and two arrows for the third-order centrifugal

radial interaction.

My conclusion is that the discrepancy between the differentiated

second-order and third-order result is the basic reason for the

existence of relativistic fine-tuning.

Some of the reasoning stated here was first done by the Dutch PhD

Physicist Han Geurdes. He has taken the time needed to appreciate the

third-order space-by-time relation. Please take the time needed to

understand the third-order space-by-time relation.

Reaction to:

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
tel:0651508884 (The Netherlands)

www.stefanboersen.nl/Contact/Coriolis_20120623_V10.htm
All the best,

ir. S.J.Boersen (junior)

ir. S.J.Boersen (senior)

__________________________________________________________________________

Dear Scientist,

The planet Mercury describes an elliptic orbit around the sun. (s1)

The left ellipse is the result of a standard calculation using the

gravitational differential equations. (s2)

Le Verrier observed a slow rotation of this ellipse. (Rosette motion) (s3)

He stated that a proper calculation should be carried out, resulting

in the rotating motion of the gravitational ellipse. (s4)

If this is truly so, a mathematical exercise should be carried out. (s5)

The present objective is: to derive a set of differential equations

that have a rotating gravitational ellipse as its result. (s6)

Einstein has explained Mercurys rotating ellipse, using his General

Theory of Relativity. (s7)

The above path suggests a completely different approach to this problem. (s8)

The method suggests a solution without the shrinking and stretching of

space and time, while maintaining the original Euclidean definition of

space and time. (s9)

Einsteins explanation seems to effectively block the effort of making

a mathematical result in a perpendicular Euclidian space. (s10)

Even if Einsteins explanation is fully accepted and appears formally

correct, differential equations resulting in a rotating gravitational

ellipse could be derived. (s11)

The assumption that 'space and time are NOT shrinking and stretching

under velocity and mass', is a biased statement. (s12)

It is assumed that the necessity of the above indicated task is obvious. (s13)

I have performed the mathematical exercise and the necessary third

time differentiation of space by time. (s14)

I want to publicize the full mathematical exercise. (s16)

Maybe you could help me with this project. (s17)

Reaction to:

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
tel:0651508884 (The Netherlands)

www.stefanboersen.nl/Contact/Coriolis_20120623_V10.htm
All the best,

ir. S.J.Boersen (junior)

ir. S.J.Boersen (senior)

test.mao.kiev.ua/images/postbyemail/3000.png