От: "Stefan Boersen"
Отправленные: Понедельник, 7 Июль 2014 г 3:20:26
Тема: The third-order space-by-time relation
In the picture in the right top corner is a mass m at radius r from
the sun. It is moving with a velocity r da/dt in the angular
direction. The mass m experiences a gravity force toward the sun and
in reaction to that it creates a reaction force out of its movement.
The magnitude of the forces is given by equation2.
If one now introduces a velocity dr/dt towards the sun then the mass m
will experience the Coriolis force or Coriolis acceleration. The
Coriolis force or Coriolis acceleration has been unknown until science
differentiated space-by-time twice and discovered equation2. Equation
2 is the magnitude squared of the Newtonian interaction in polar
coordinates and or in Cartesian coordinates. If one differentiates
space-by-time for the third time one is confronted with equations3.
Suppose we have a system that is described with differentiated forces.
If a system, which apparently has changing accelerations in two
dimensions, then what is going to happen? Science thinks in forces,
so science will simply differentiate the forces and then it is assumed
to work all well.
But there is a mistake. If the system is having changing accelerations
in two dimensions it should be described by equations3. This means
that if particle is moving at a radius r with a velocity r da/dt then
it will experience the new third-order Coriolis interactions. These
interactions are unexpected and unseen until one has done the third
time differentiation of space-by-time. The new third-order Coriolis
interactions are derived from a mathematical exercise. They are
discovered the same way as the second order Coriolis interaction has
been discovered. They cannot be stated invalid.
It is now clear that we cannot think in differentiated forces. The
differentiation of space by time for the third time introduces new
third-order Coriolis interactions. Electromagnetic radiation is known
to be described by differentiated forces. The description of
electromagnetic radiation will only work if the described situation is
one-dimensional. The description of electromagnetic radiation cannot
be done with differentiated forces when the forces are
If one draws a picture of a two-dimensional force differentiated by
time then one should draw three arrows for the third-order Coriolis
angular interaction and two arrows for the third-order centrifugal
My conclusion is that the discrepancy between the differentiated
second-order and third-order result is the basic reason for the
existence of relativistic fine-tuning.
Some of the reasoning stated here was first done by the Dutch PhD
Physicist Han Geurdes. He has taken the time needed to appreciate the
third-order space-by-time relation. Please take the time needed to
understand the third-order space-by-time relation.
The planet Mercury describes an elliptic orbit around the sun. (s1)
The left ellipse is the result of a standard calculation using the
gravitational differential equations. (s2)
Le Verrier observed a slow rotation of this ellipse. (Rosette motion) (s3)
He stated that a proper calculation should be carried out, resulting
in the rotating motion of the gravitational ellipse. (s4)
If this is truly so, a mathematical exercise should be carried out. (s5)
The present objective is: to derive a set of differential equations
that have a rotating gravitational ellipse as its result. (s6)
Einstein has explained Mercurys rotating ellipse, using his General
Theory of Relativity. (s7)
The above path suggests a completely different approach to this problem. (s8)
The method suggests a solution without the shrinking and stretching of
space and time, while maintaining the original Euclidean definition of
space and time. (s9)
Einsteins explanation seems to effectively block the effort of making
a mathematical result in a perpendicular Euclidian space. (s10)
Even if Einsteins explanation is fully accepted and appears formally
correct, differential equations resulting in a rotating gravitational
ellipse could be derived. (s11)
The assumption that 'space and time are NOT shrinking and stretching
under velocity and mass', is a biased statement. (s12)
It is assumed that the necessity of the above indicated task is obvious. (s13)
I have performed the mathematical exercise and the necessary third
time differentiation of space by time. (s14)
I want to publicize the full mathematical exercise. (s16)
Maybe you could help me with this project. (s17)